¶1Whaley appeals his sentence of 30 years imposed under the enhanced penalty statute, raising the procedural issue that the trial court failed to specifically find from a preponderance of the evidence that it was necessary for the protection of the public to sentence the appellant to an extended term. Upon consideration of the record and precedent on this point, we conclude such a finding is required. § 775.084(3) and (3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1979); Levy v. State, 375 So.2d 606 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Grimmett v. State, 357 So.2d 461 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). See Adams v. State, 376 So.2d 47, 58-59 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Fry v. State, 359 So.2d 584 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). The sentence is therefore vacated and the cause remanded for appropriate findings and imposition of sentence accordingly.
382 So. 2d 802
Whaley v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 11, 1980
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1980-04-11
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2003
14 state decisions
Relies on 376 So. 2d 47 - Adams v. State · 357 So. 2d 461 - Grimmett v. State · Fry v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1980-04-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →