Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 382 S.W.2d 198 - Walker v. Keith

Walker v. Keith’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
6
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2018

14 state decisions

60196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Slade v. City of Lexington · Edwards v. Tobin · Hall v. Weatherford · National Bank of Kentucky v. Louisville Trust Co. · 38 Okla. Crim. 122 - Ex Parte Deal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"To be enforceable and valid, a contract to enter into a future covenant must specify all material and essential terms and leave nothing to be agreed upon as a result of future negotiations."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “rental will be fixed in such amount as shall actually be agreed upon by the lessors and the lessee with the monthly rental fixed on the comparative basis of rental values as of the date of the renewal with rental values at this time reflected by the comparative business conditions of the two periods.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““It is a necessary requirement in the nature of things that an agreement in order to be binding must be sufficiently definite to enable a court to give it an exact meaning.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.