Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 382 S.W.2d 601 - State v. Webb

State v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
July 2001
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2001

22 state decisions

10019641970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Watson · State v. Oliver · State v. Drew · State v. Thresher · State v. Schrum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * with conscious knowledge of the fact that the property was stolen, exercised dominion and control over it * * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The requirement of exclusive possession does not mean that the possession necessarily must be separate from all others, ... provided there is other evidence to connect defendant with the offense ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.