Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 382 S.W.2d 771 - Globe Indemnity Company v. French

Globe Indemnity Company v. French’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2017

9 state decisions

50196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Brann · Olgin v. Employers Mut. Casualty Co. · Sunshine Mutual Insurance Co. v. Mai · Main v. Cameron · Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Brandt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]o affirm the judgment of the lower court we would in effect be holding that when a college student loans his car to a •friend of long standing all other students riding in the car have his implied permission to drive it regardless of his knowledge of their habits or regardless of his previous relationship with them. This .court is not willing to extend the doctrine of implied consent, that far until higher authority requires us to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “There had been no course of conduct or relation between them [named insured and second permittee] to indicate mutual acquiescence and no usage or practice of the parties over a period of time preceding the day upon which the insured automobile was being used.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.