Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

382 U.S. 9

86 S. Ct. 49

15 L. Ed. 2d 10

Docket No. 191.

Travia v. Lomenzo

Supreme Court of the United States

October 11, 1965

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1965-11-22

Relies on WMCA, Inc. v. Lomenzo

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1965-11-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1995

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

801965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Simon H. Rifkind and Edward N. Costikyan, for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Daniel M. Cohen, Asst. Sol. Gen., Donald Zimmerman, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., George D. Zuckerman, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Willis Burton Lemon, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted.

¶2

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

¶3

Mr. Justice FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

¶4

[For concurring opinion of Mr. Justice HARLAN, see WMCA, Inc., et al. v. Lomenzo, 86 S.Ct. 24.]

/382/us/9 · .json · Public domain