Long v. Emery’s Empirical Analysis
383 F.2d 392 · 1967
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 2006
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hill v. Hawes · Nichols-Morris Corp. v. Morris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“charg[e] the prospective appellant with the duty of following the progress of the action and advising himself when the court makes an order he wishes to protest.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“lack of notice of entry [of an order or judgment] by the clerk does not affect the time to appeal or relieve or authorize the court to relieve a party for failure to appeal within the time allowed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.