Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 383 F.2d 772 - No 16010

No 16010’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
September 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2018

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

40196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board · Local 1976, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v. National Labor Relations Board · Local 24, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Oliver · Houston Insulation Contractors Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board · Meat Hwy. Dri., Dockmen, Etc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[i]f the object of the agreement is to benefit the employees of the bargaining unit represented by the union, it is 'primary' and in such event does not fall within the proscription of § 8(e), whereas if the object is the application of pressure on an outside employer in order to require him to accede to union objectives[,] it is 'secondary' and within the prohibition of § 8(e).'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]t shall be an unfair labor practice for any labor organization and any employer to enter into any contract or agreement, express or implied, whereby such employer ceases or refrains or agrees to cease or refrain from handling, using, selling, transporting or otherwise dealing in any of the products of any other employer, or to cease doing business with any other person, and any contract or agreement entered into heretofore or hereafter containing such an agreement shall be to such extent unenforcible [sic] and void ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.