Fullenkamp v. Veneman’s Empirical Analysis
383 F.3d 478 · 2004
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Mead Corp. · Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co. · Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · Barnhart Commissioner of Social Security v. Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“determine whether the language at issue has a plain and unambiguous meaning with regard to the particular dispute in the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.