Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 383 F.3d 591 - Subhan v. Ashcroft

Subhan v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

383 F.3d 591 · 2004

Citation profile

118
cited by 118 later decisions
January 2021
most recently cited

60 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 118 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably Fernandez v. Gonzales (2006), Ahmed v. Gonzales (2006)

60 federal appellate ·

1050200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jesus Torres-Aguilar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Hector Montero-Martinez v. John Ashcroft Attorney General of the United States · Castellano-Chacon v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Baires v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Gonzalez-Oropeza v. U.S. Attorney General

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 118 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “even that an illegal alien should not be allowed to delay his removal beyond a year.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that the immigration judge, seconded by the Board of Immigration Appeals . . . violated [8 U.S.C. §] 1255(i) when he denied Subhan a continuance without giving a reason consistent with the statute (indeed without giving any reason).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`be able to eventually acquire lawful permanent resident status by virtue of employment,' not having done so as yet he was `not eligible for this form of relief at this time.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.