In Re Randall Todd Nielsen’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Khalil v. Developers Surety & Indemnity Co. (In Re Khalil) (2007), Murrietta v. Fehrs (In Re Fehrs) (2008)
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Beezley v. California Land Title Co. · Lawrence National Bank v. Edmonds · In Re: First Td Investment Inc · Bowman v. Belt Valley Bank (In Re Bowman)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'dischargeability is unaffected by scheduling' in a Chapter 7 no-assets, no-bar-date bankruptcy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the filing of a [proof of] claim is meaningless and worthless in a no-asset case”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.