Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 383 Ill. 598 - Johnston v. Herrin

Johnston v. Herrin’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
December 1993
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 1993

13 state decisions

130194319501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Potter v. Couch · Ducker v. Burnham · Knight v. Pottgieser · Haward v. Peavey · Carper v. Crowl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . The word ‘surviving’ is a part of the description of those who are to take. This marks a distinction between this case and those cited by appellants. ‘Surviving’ is a word of survivorship which describes the gift and the donees and precludes the vesting of the gift until it can be determined who such donees are.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A gift to survivors, which is preceded by a particular estate at the expiration of which the gift is to take effect in possession, will take effect in favor of those, only, who survive the particular estate. Such a remainder is necessarily contingent since it cannot be known until the death of the life tenant who of the testator’s surviving descendants will survive her to take the estate.” (Johnston, 383 Ill. at 605 , 50 N.E.2d at 724 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.