Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 383 Mich. 722 - In Re Albert

In Re Albert’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2005

8 state decisions

201970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A court’s judicial notice of its own records is a wholly satisfactory ‘other method’ of establishing the failure or the fact of filing in a particular period — the gravamen of the charge here.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “without becoming so personally interested as to be disqualified.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.