Daniels v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2010
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 44 Cal. 2d 523 - People v. Raven · Stephenson v. United States · Mahle v. State · State v. Duggan · 167 Cal. App. 2d 400 - People v. Malone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“But that is a separate offense and would not make her an accomplice of the thieves, unless * * * she conspired in a pre-arranged plan with David and the defendants for them to steal the money and to deliver it ⅛ * ⅝ ‡0 her.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Flores v. State““An accomplice is one who in some manner, knowingly and with criminal intent aids, abets, assists or participates in a criminal act.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Beavers v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.