Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 1989
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 95 Okla. Crim. 60 - Toms v. State · 89 Okla. Crim. 160 - Hudman v. State · 88 Okla. Crim. 279 - Glasgow v. State · 95 Okla. Crim. 44 - Garrett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[M]echanical devices are scientific instruments designed for obtaining results to prove the guilt or innocence of a defendant, in order to be admissible, require various degrees of evidence as to their scientific reliability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shears v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.