McCROSSON v. Tanenbaum’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Woodall v. Woodall · Ex Parte Sc Dept. of Health & Human Svcs. · Wooten v. Wooten · Ex Parte Morris · McCrosson v. Tanenbaum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“although the standard of review in such cases is broad, an appellate court should be reluctant to substitute its own judgment for that of the family court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lewis v. Lewis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.