State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · United States v. Nobles · Frye v. United States · State v. Council · State v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Here, there were only two available expert -witnesses on the “barefoot insole impression” evidence. The trial judge recognized this anomaly and properly limited the State to only eliciting non-protected information____Moreover, the State only called [the expert] during an in camera hearing for the benefit of the trial judge’s ruling on the admissibility of the “barefoot insole impression” evidence. Because [the expert] did not testify during the trial, the State’s decision to call [the expert] as a witness could not have affected the jury’s assessment of the evidence.... Additionally, the State’s questioning of [the expert] was confined to general testimony regarding his expertise and his opinion regarding the scientific reliability of the evidence. Significantly, the State did not question [the expert] concerning the specifics of the crime scene evidence.... Based on the foregoing, we hold the trial judge’s decision denying [the defendant’s] motion to quash the State’s subpoena of [the expert] did not constitute reversible error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barnes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.