Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 383 SO2D 1052 - Jenks v. Gulla

Jenks v. Gulla’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 1985
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mattox v. American Indemnity Company · New Orleans Industrial Canal Land & Harbor Development Co. v. Kohler · Fruge v. Langley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We do not necessarily equate the absence of evidence in the record with the proposition that the trial court did not, in fact, have sufficient evidence before it upon which to properly adjudicate the issue. In the interest of justice and judicial efficiency, we remand to the lower court in order that any evidence previously offered may be made a part of the record and, if necessary, to allow evidence to be offered on the exception.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.