Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 383 SO2D 108 - Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2004
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 2004

3 state decisions

10198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 310 So. 2d 696 - Malter v. McKinney · Martin v. South Coast Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A judgment dismissing an action shall be rendered upon application of any party, when the plaintiff fails to appear on the day set for trial. In such case, the court shall determine whether the judgment of dismissal shall be with or without prejudice.” LSA-C.C.P. art. 1672(A).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.