Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 383 SO2D 1122 - Gerardo v. State

Gerardo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1982
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 283 So. 2d 857 - Troupe v. Rowe · Knoblock v. Knoblock · 360 So. 2d 1119 - Hendricks v. State · 195 So. 2d 562 - Falagan v. Wainwright · 374 So. 2d 1041 - Rosier v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Section 917.14, Florida Statutes (1977), provides for an examination and hearing in the circuit court to determine whether a defendant is a mentally disordered sex offender: (1) If a defendant has been convicted of or has pleaded guilty or no contest to an offense or attempted offense in a current prosecution, the court may defer sentencing and certify him for a hearing and examination in the circuit court to determine whether he is a mentally disordered sex offender. (2) The court may certify a defendant under subsection (1) on its own motion, on motion by the State Attorney or the defendant, or on application by affidavit of the defendant. Under Sections 917.14 through 917.20 the court appoints not less than two experts to make personal examinations of the defendant. These experts make a written report to the court including all facts necessary to assist the judge in passing sentence on or committing the defendant. The court then holds a hearing to determine whether the defendant is a mentally disordered sex offender. The court or the parties may call the appointed experts, and the parties may cross-examine them in the same manner as any other witness. Additional witnesses may be called to give material testimony. If the court finds that the defendant is a mentally disordered sex offender it must commit him to the custody of the Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services for care, treatment and rehabilitation. The department is periodically required to file a report des”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.