Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 383 SW2D 344 - McDaniel v. McDaniel

McDaniel v. McDaniel’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2002
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 2002

3 state decisions

1019641970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Logsdon v. Logsdon · Bickel v. Ford Motor Co. · Moran v. Moran · Crowe v. Crowe · Williams v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the rule is that a divorce judgment procured through fraud and perjury as to residence may by direct attack be set aside as void even though the party obtaining the divorce has remarried and innocent parties may be affected.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.