Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 383 U.S. 75 - Rosenblatt v. Baer

Rosenblatt v. Baer’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

2,032
cited by 2,032 later decisions
88
cited 88 times by the Supreme Court
47
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

387 federal appellate · 156 district · 1,075 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,032 later decisions (88 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2025 · most notably Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois (1968), Paul v. Davis (1976)

387 federal appellate · 156 district · 1,075 state decisions — followed in 47 states

58101966197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Jackson v. Denno · Roth v. United States · Screws v. United States · Thornhill v. Alabama

Cited together with New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts · St. Amant v. Thompson · Garrison v. State of Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,032 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “substantial responsibility for or control over the conduct of governmental affairs.”
    149 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “prohibits a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves that the statement was made with ` actual malice. '”
    21 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The employee's position must be one which would invite public scrutiny and discussion of the person holding it, entirely apart from the scrutiny and discussion occasioned by the particular charges in controversy.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.