383 U.S. 831
Docket No. 1128.
DRUM ET AL. v. SEAWELL, CHAIRMAN OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ET AL.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 4, 1966.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1966-04-04
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“The motion to advance and expedite consideration is granted. The judgment is affirmed.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including Preisler v. Secretary of State of Missouri
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1966-04-04
Cited by 12 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2002
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Louis Rabil and Robinson O. Everett for appellants.
¶2T. Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, James F. Bullock, Assistant Attorney General, and Thomas L. Young for appellees.
¶3PER CURIAM.
¶4The motion to advance and expedite consideration is granted. The judgment is affirmed.