State v. Brothers’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
May 1986
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Taylor v. Louisiana · Craig v. Boren · Loving v. Commonwealth of Virginia · Reed v. Reed · Eisenstadt v. Baird
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Among the reasons the State has cited in support of the statutory rape statute and its distinction between male and female, are the greater possibility of injury to a female victim, the possibility of pregnancy, and the physiological and sociological problems said to be more likely to be attendant upon a female victim than a male victim. An attempt to give extra protection to the female victim on account of these potential problems is a valid objective and the classification contained in the legislation appears to bear a fair and substantial relationship to the problems the statute is designed to meet.” Id. at 405 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rundlett““A male is guilty of rape in the second degree when he intentionally engages in sexual intercourse with a female without her consent.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Acosta v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.