Grant v. Mossman’s Empirical Analysis
384 F.2d 496 · 1967
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
January 1972
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on State Ex Rel. Apt v. Mitchell · Howell, Jewett & Co. v. McCrie · Banner v. Welch · Cole v. Coons · West v. Grove
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The fact that the ownership [in the property] was by co-tenancy does not deny the co-tenants the right to claim a homestead in the property.” [Grant v. Mossman, 384 F.2d 496 (C. A.10, 1967); Cole v. Coons, 162 Kan. 624 , 178 P.2d 997 ; Banner v. Welch, 115 Kan. 868 , 225 P. 98 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““A homestead ... of one acre within the limits of an incorporated . . . city, occupied as a residence by the family of the owner . shall be exempted from forced sale under any process of law . .; but no property shall be exempt from sale for taxes ff”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.