Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 F.2d 554 - United States v. John William Butenko and Igor A. Ivanov, United States of America v. Igor A. Ivanov

United States v. John William Butenko and Igor A. Ivanov, United States of America v. Igor A. Ivanov’s Empirical Analysis

384 F.2d 554 · 1967

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 2005
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2005

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

8019671970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · Cooper v. State of California · Hirabayashi v. United States · Lawn v. United States · Sinclair v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If two or more persons conspire to violate this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “■“Their subsequent search of the car * * was closely related to the reason petitioner was arrested * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.