Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 F.2d 621 - Baines v. Swenson

Baines v. Swenson’s Empirical Analysis

384 F.2d 621 · 1967

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
March 1975
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Townsend v. Sain · Fay v. Noia · Sanders v. United States · Brulotte Et Al. v. Thys Company · Turner v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * as a matter of appropriate federal-state relationship and fitting judicial deference in this special situation, the federal courts ordinarily, before entertaining an application by a state prisoner for federal habeas corpus relief, should require him to again seek consideration and determination of his claims of constitutional violation under the state’s collateral-attack remedy, in order to give the state courts the opportunity to examine and deal with such claims * * [Emphasis supplied by court in Baines, supra.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.