Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 F.2d 649 - Smith v. United States

Smith v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

384 F.2d 649 · 1967

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2022

4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

301967197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Douglas v. People of State of California · Harders v. California · Camodeo v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The present application is of little help to either the court or the client. The cause of advocacy is not served to read a brief filed by appellant's own counsel asserting the government's position in the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “no genuine issue or legal point which can be raised [on] appeal,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.