Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 F.2d 677 - United States v. Certain Parcels of Land Located in Fairfax

United States v. Certain Parcels of Land Located in Fairfax’s Empirical Analysis

384 F.2d 677 · 1967

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably Morgan v. Kerrigan (1976), 6 Cal. 4th 738 - City of San Diego v. Neumann (1993)

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

801967197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Merz · United States v. Cunningham · United States v. Lewis · Carpenter v. Union Insurance Society of Canton, Ltd.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “disqualification is a matter for the exercise of discretion by the district judge, unless actual bias has been demonstrated beyond reasonable possibility of disagreement.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The path followed by the commissioners in reaching the amount of the award can, however, be distinctly marked. Such a requirement is within the competence of laymen; and laymen, like judges, will give more careful consideration to the problem if they are required to state not only the end result of their inquiry, but the process by which they reached it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “were within the range of testimony as to severance damages adduced before the commission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.