Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 F.3d 1069 - Stevenson v. Lewis

Stevenson v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

384 F.3d 1069 · 2004

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2025

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

140200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Christopher Former Secretary of State et al. v. Harbury · John Barron John Craig Luke Tiernan John Craig v. Mayor City Council of Baltimore · Clark v. Murphy · 25 Cal. 4th 1046 - Shawn Garfield Price v. Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If there is no Supreme Court precedent that controls a legal issue raised by a petitioner in state court, the state court's decision cannot be contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly-established federal law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.