Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 F.3d 1243 - United States v. Stuart

United States v. Stuart’s Empirical Analysis

384 F.3d 1243 · 2004

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
July 2009
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742

Relies on United States v. Sanchez-Rodriguez · United States v. Brye · United States v. Saldana · United States v. Mandhai · United States v. Mesa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “factor which removes the case from the heartland of the Guidelines and warrants a downward departure must be supported by evidence in the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “not adequately taken into consideration by the Sentencing Commission in formulating the Guidelines ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.