Camposeco-Montejo v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
384 F.3d 814 · 2004
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Ali v. Ashcroft (2005), Maharaj v. Gonzales (2006)
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Heckler v. Chaney · Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft · Lincoln v. Vigil · Vargas v. U.S. Department of Immigration & Naturalization
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“certainly did not experience in [the third country] the freedom and complete lack of `molestation or persecution' that seemed to characterize the applicants' stays in Cheo and Vang.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Maharaj v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.