Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 F.3d 822 - Rivera v. NIBCO, Inc.

Rivera v. NIBCO, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

384 F.3d 822 · 2004

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4 · 29 U.S.C. § 151 (§ 1 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (§ 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1324A (§ 274a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1324C (§ 274c of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Faragher v. City of Boca Raton · Hickman v. Taylor · Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · William Marbury v. James Madison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether disclosure will violate any privacy interests; (2) whether the information being sought is for a legitimate purpose or for an improper purpose; (3) whether disclosure of the information will cause a party embarrassment, hardship, oppression or other harm; (4) whether confidentiality is being sought over information important to public health and safety; (5) whether the sharing of information among litigants will promote fairness and efficiency; (6) whether a party benefitting from the order of confidentiality is a public entity or official; and (7) whether the case involves issues important to the public.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.