Martin v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis
384 F.3d 848 · 2004
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Pole v. Randolph (2009), Johnson v. Thurmer (2010)
10 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Agurs · Lindh v. Murphy · Yarborough v. Gentry · 145 Ill. 2d 353 - People v. Illgen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.