Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 F.3d 906 - Tolosa v. Ashcroft

Tolosa v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

384 F.3d 906 · 2004

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
November 2013
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Chen Yun Gao v. Ashcroft · Georgis v. Ashcroft · Niam v. Ashcroft · Ahmed v. Ashcroft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A petitioner's experience of past persecution gives rise to a rebuttable presumption that she will face future persecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.