Zeiler v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
384 F.3d 932 · 2004
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Lowe v. Apfel · Robert J. Lauer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security · Krogmeier v. Barnhart · McKinney v. Apfel · Groeper v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[S]ubjective complaints of pain cannot be disregarded solely because there is no supporting medical evidence, but they can be discounted if the ALJ finds inconsistencies in the record as a whole.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“less than a preponderance, but is enough that a reasonable mind would find it adequate to support the Commissioner's conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cox v. Barnhart“[T]here is no medical evidence supporting [the claimant's] claim that she needs to lie down during the day.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.