Corado v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
384 F.3d 945 · 2004
Citation profile
28 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably Shi Liang Lin v. United States Department of Justice (2007), Gilaj v. Gonzales (2005)
28 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. Juan Anibal Aguirre-Aguirre · Ngure v. Ashcroft · Regalado-Garcia v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“exaggerated, non-specific, or lacking in immediacy”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.