Ateka v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
384 F.3d 954 · 2004
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably Kechkar v. Gonzales (2007), Falaja v. Gonzales (2005)
24 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1324A (§ 274a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Ngure v. Ashcroft · Regalado-Garcia v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Dominguez v. Ashcroft · Haoud v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any alien who falsely represents, or has falsely represented, himself or herself to be a citizen of the United States for any purpose or benefit under this chapter (including section 1324a of this title) or any other Federal or State law is inadmissible.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f a petitioner fails to raise a particular issue when he appeals to the Board,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“may review a final order of removal only if ... the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies available to the alien as of right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ramirez v. Sessions
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.