384 F. Supp. 21 - MacChiavelli v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently July 2009 · most notably Harper Sibley, Jr., Cross v. Tandy Corporation, Tandy Corporation, Cross (1976), Dickinson v. Heinold Securities, Inc. (1981)
14 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 2 · 9 U.S.C. § 3
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Wilko v. Swan · Glidden Company v. Zdanok Et Al. · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. · Kelly v. Kosuga
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]lthough related, the claims of Securities Act violations in this case are clearly severable from the other claims, both factually and legally.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.