384 F. Supp. 2d 501 - O'BRIEN v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Thomas v. Arn · Schmerber v. State of California · Chambers v. Mississippi · Rochin v. People of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“were not based on the defendant's exercise of his right to remain silent, but on the defendant's failure to see any value in any treatment programs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. O'Brien v. Marshall“a significant danger to the public and . . . not amenable to rehabilitation within the juvenile justice system.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. O'Brien v. Marshall“), Commonwealth v. O'Brien, 432 Mass. 578, 736 N.E.2d 841, 854 (2000) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. O'Brien v. Marshall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.