Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 Ill. 428 - McFarlin v. McFarlin

McFarlin v. McFarlin’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably 76 Ill. 2d 53 - Strukoff v. Strukoff (1979), Persico v. Persico (1951)

29 state decisions

100194319501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Smith · Supreme Hive Ladies of the Maccabees of the World v. Harrington · Way v. Way · Oakman v. Small · Werner v. Illinois Central Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In each of these classes of cases, whether under the constitution of 1848 or the present constitution, this court has adopted the reasoning of People ex rel. Beebe v. Evans, 18 Ill. 361 , that the constitutional provision means that all legislation creating city courts shall be restricted to the single purpose of creating a court for the benefit of the city to meet its wants and to dispose of litigation that arises within the city. Legislation which accomplishes such purpose does not transcend the constitutional provision.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Jurisdiction of the subject matter is the power of a court to hear and determine causes of the general class to which the proceeding in question belongs, and such jurisdiction is always conferred by law. In its application to a certain controversy, jurisdiction means the power and authority to hear and determine the issues involved in the cause. Woodward v. Ruel, 355 Ill. 163 ; People v. Ford, 289 Ill. 550 ; Oakman v. Small, 282 Ill. 360 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.