Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 Ill. 535 - Moore v. Edmonds

Moore v. Edmonds’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
November 1997
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently November 1997 · most notably 111 Ill. 2d 58 - People v. Bowel (1986), 115 Ill. 2d 445 - Kingston v. Turner (1987)

8 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

90194319501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lerette v. Director General of Railroads · O'Hare v. Chicago, Madison & Northern Railroad · Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Lewis · Smithers v. Henriquez · Kavanaugh v. Parret

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * Our attention is also directed to the fact that a sign, about thirty-eight and one-half by twenty-three inches in size, behind the counter on the wall of the warming room where the ticket was purchased contained these words: ‘Warning You Ride At Your Own Risk — Be Careful!’ According to plaintiff, he did not see the sign. A woman patron the same evening testified that she failed to see the sign. Each of the three defendants testified to the presence of the sign as did three persons who were assisting defendants with the operation of the slide. A concession that plaintiff did see the sign would not relieve defendants from liability, but would merely amount to an assumption of risk of the known or ordinary dangers to be encountered. The question of whether the alleged release was obtained knowingly and fairly is a fact question to be decided by the jury. * * #»”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.