Commonwealth v. Jarabek’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Commonwealth v. Blood (1987), United States v. Jarabek (1984)
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Hoffa v. United States · United States v. White · Lopez v. United States · Osborn v. United States · Commonwealth v. Moon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The Federal officer exemption . . . allows Federal officials to conduct their own investigations in accordance with Federal law, free of the statute’s criminal and civil penalties. The exemption does not render the Federal interceptions automatically admissible in a State prosecution.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“organized crime . . . consists of a continuing conspiracy among highly organized and disciplined groups to engage in supplying illegal goods and services.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a scheme by two municipal officials to extort a kickback from a single contractor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.