Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 N.W.2d 175 - State v. Hodges

State v. Hodges’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2022

9 state decisions

3019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Garcia · State v. Back · Ture v. State · STATE, CTY. OF HENNEPIN v. McClay · State v. Brusven

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Upon prosecution for a crime, the actor may be convicted of either the crime charged or an included offense, but not both. An included offense may be any of the following: (1) A lesser degree of the same crime; or (2) An attempt to commit the crime charged; or (3) An attempt to commit a lesser degree of the same crime; or (4) A crime necessarily proved if the crime charged were proved; or . (5) A petty misdemeanor necessarily proved if the misdemeanor were proved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State of Minnesota v. Timothy John Bakken
  2. “[Although the victim’s age and vulnerability made the crime of felony murder more likely to occur and were causal factors in her death, they are not elements of the offense of felony murder. They are not factors which the legislature considered in determining the elements of felony murder in the second degree, distinguishing it from other degrees of homicide, and were thus not factors in determining the presumptive sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Rodriguez

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.