State v. Lashwood’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 2014
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · McCarthy v. United States · Bolius v. Wainwright · Clark v. State · State v. Sutton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This Court ... has held that it is not necessary to re-advise the defendant of his rights immediately prior to pleading guilty if the record shows the defendant had knowledge of his rights and the consequences of his plea when entered, and we have upheld guilty pleas where the same judge informed and canvassed the defendant once, and then later accepted a guilty plea without re-advising the defendant, where the time lapse was five hours, where the time lapse was 26 days, and where the time lapse was 30 days.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Weiker v. Solem“In order to overturn an otherwise effective plea, a defendant claiming involuntariness based upon mental condition must show that the mental condition was so debilitating that she was unable to consult with counsel or unable to understand the proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bailey“an understanding of the nature of the charge, without realizing that his conduct did not actually fall within the charge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Butler v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.