Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 NW2D 461 - Thompson v. State

Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
3
states following
June 2007
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mincey v. Arizona · Cree v. Goldstein · Williams v. United States · United States v. Peltier · Ristaino v. Ross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the owner or occupant of the premises permits the police to make a search without a warrant at a time when the occupant is not even suspected of complicity in the crime, the police are lulled into a sense of security, and [therefore] the occupant [can]not later object if the search led to the discovery of evidence which ultimately resulted in his being charged with complicity in the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.