Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 P2D 54 - Brown v. State

Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2018

22 state decisions

100196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Culombe v. Connecticut · Rogers v. Richmond · Lyons v. State of Oklahoma · 77 Okla. Crim. 197 - Lyons v. State · 13 Okla. Crim. 176 - Miller v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defendant must, in all cases, be taken before the magistrate without unnecessary delay.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A period of eight days elapsed before the defendant was taken before a magistrate, Such delay could amount to a denial of a substantial right, but no such deprivation has been established by the record. The burden is on the defendant to establish prejudice by reason of the delay. In In re: Dare, Okl.Cr., 370 P. 2d 846 , a delay of 33 days was held not to be prejudicial under the circumstances. Each case must depend on its own facts.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““. . . The burden is on the defendant to establish prejudice by reason of the delay.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.