Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 S.C. 539 - Binney v. State

Binney v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Torrence · Paalan v. United States · Cherry v. State · In the Matter of Glover · State v. Gaines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In interpreting statutes, th[is] Court looks to the plain meaning of the statute and the intent of the Legislature. Furthermore, if possible, legislative intent should be found in the plain language of the statute itself. If a statute’s language is plain and unambiguous, and conveys a clear and definite meaning, the rules of statutory interpretation are not needed and the Court has no right to impose another meaning.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.