Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 SO2D 1328 - State v. Kirkland

State v. Kirkland’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1981
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Brown v. Ohio · Ex Parte Nielsen · 375 So. 2d 836 - State v. Pinder · State v. Cooper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]lthough it is quite correct, as argued by the State, that the crime of first degree murder contains one fact that is in addition to the elements of robbery (specifically, in proving the first degree murder charge the State would be required to prove the fact and cause of the death of Mr. Rosenthal in addition to proving the elements of the strong-armed robbery) it is equally clear that the robbery does not require the proof of any fact or element that would not also be required to be proved in the first degree murder case. 384 So.2d at 1330 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.