Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 So. 2d 317 - Stith v. Stith

384 So. 2d 317 - Stith v. Stith’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
February 2001
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · Davis v. Davis · 384 So. 2d 1258 - O'MALLEY v. Pan Am. Bank of Orlando · Aldrich v. Aldrich · 377 So. 2d 761 - Desilets v. Desilets

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. The wife may not assign the policies to anyone and shall have no right to borrow against the policies or to surrender them for their cash surrender value. 2. Should the wife die or remarry prior to the husband's death, ownership of the policies shall revert to the husband or his designee. 3. The parties shall cause the wife to be irrevocably designated beneficiary of the policies contingent upon her also being the owner of the policies at the husband's death; that is, if at the husband's death, the wife is living and has not remarried. Otherwise, the proceeds are to be payable to a beneficiary selected by the husband or, if none, to his estate. 4. The husband shall pay all premiums due on the policies and all interest due on the existing loans against the policies until the death or remarriage of the wife, or until his death, whichever shall first occur. 5. The parties shall cause a copy of the conditions of the award to be sent to each of the life insurance companies which issued the policies and shall file in the trial court an acknowledgment of receipt from each company. [ Id. at 321 ].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.