Olivier v. Doga’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
September 1988
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 376 So. 2d 495 - Calk v. Highland Const. & Mfg. · 294 So. 2d 512 - Succession of Butler · Aucoin v. Williams · 295 So. 2d 868 - Aucoin v. Williams · Cooper v. Cooper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"... As a mere observation, attorney-intervenor a fortiori should not be required to record his contract as against the husband who is a party to the lawsuit; but as noted above in Calk , recordation was not necessary and it was error for the Court of Appeal to restrict the operative effect of R.S. 9:5001 by imposing on it the restrictive requirement of prior recordation of the contingency fee contract." Olivier v. Doga, supra at 332.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.